Google Caffeine And The New Ranking Factors

Posted By on December 7, 2009

Google Caffeine is the name given to Google’s “Next Generation” search engine, which it will use to rank and index all the pages on the wonderful world wide web. According to all indications, this is not just another one of Google’s infamous Updates, but a major “Overhaul” of its index and algorithm – the complex formula and calculations Google uses to rank all web pages, including yours.

If that doesn’t sound ominous enough, according to Matt Cutts (Google Spokesperson) one database is already showing Google Caffeine, and the full blown version will be released after the holidays. The reasoning behind this – Google doesn’t want to upset webmasters and site owners during the lucrative holiday buying season. In the past, other major Google Updates have come around this time of the year, most notably the “Florida Update”
which severely affected many web sites and webmasters.

Recently, Google has been more aware and much more generous to webmasters by being more open and forthcoming in regards to how it indexes its pages. This time around, webmasters were even given access to a beta version of Caffeine which Google released last summer (’09) where webmasters could check to see how well their keywords and site would fare in this new search index. This beta site (www2.sandbox.google.com) has now been taken down by Google.

Like any professional search engine marketer who works online, I was constantly checking my sites and keywords in Google’s new search engine. I have drawn some conclusions from what I have observed, but please be aware it is often very foolish to draw conclusions and make predictions from your own small sampling of results. You can end up with egg on your face very quickly, especially when you consider Google is probably still making adjustments and refinements on Caffeine as it analyzes the results.

However, there are certain ranking factors that even Google is telling us about, mainly “Site Speed” or how fast your site loads will play a part in how its ranked. We have also heard a lot about “Broken Links” and if your page or site has them, then it will probably be ranked lower. Of course, linking out to “Bad Neighborhoods” will probably still not be a good practice, if you want higher rankings within Google.

It should not come as a shock or a surprise, that “Over-All Page Quality” will play a greater role in how well your page ranks. Keep in mind, Google is like any other company putting out a product, if that product doesn’t have a high standard of quality, it reflects badly back on everyone concerned. Google’s SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages) are the key to all their online revenue, they must do everything in their power to keep that product fast, relevant, current and above all high quality.

Therefore, expect “OnPage Factors” to play a much greater role in Google Caffeine. Quality unique content, page design, good navigation, title, meta tags, description, keyword density, alt tags, page views, bounce rate, traffic numbers, time spent on page, and the number of social bookmarks may play an increased role in achieving high rankings. A perfectly optimized keyworded page, with the keyword in the title, description, meta tags, alt tags, on the page… will probably get you ranked higher in Caffeine, as well as most search engines on the web.

This may be pure speculation on my part, but one of the areas Caffeine will be addressing or incorporating is “Social BookMarking”, that is the number of social bookmarks a page receives will determine how high it is ranked. I also believe one of the major reasons these bookmarks will become much more important has to do with the whole nasty issue of link buying.

Now, the integrity of Google’s index is not in question, but any savvy marketer or webmaster knows any individual or company with deep pockets and huge resources can buy their way into the top spot. Despite Google’s attempt to stop it, link buying and keyword positioning, is a thriving industry on the web. Rightly or wrongly, money and unlimited resources will get you or your company to the top in organic search, regardless of which search engine you’re targeting.

All moral and ethnical issues aside, the small webmaster and/or online marketer is stuck right in the middle, with Google on one side and these major multinational competitors on the other. Looming on the horizon is Google Caffeine, a new sheriff in town!

What New Rules Will This Sheriff Bring?

The major question here is this: has the importance of backlinking been downplayed in this new index in favor of the keyworded domain and onsite content and optimization? Has there been a major shift to listing more quality content rather than relying on the number of backlinks a site is receiving, even from important related themed sites? The major problem and question to Google is this: if links can be bought, how do you keep your organic results democratic and fair, which was the original intention of Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they started Google in 1998.

One Possible Solution is Social Bookmarking.

Will we see an ever growing importance of social bookmarks and links in this new index. It is quite easy to buy 1000 links, but getting 1000 or 10,000 “re-tweets” is a little more difficult. Similarly, getting two or three thousand “diggs” may be a little harder to pull off. Same goes for Del.icio.us bookmarks, Facebook fans… well you get the picture. Will Google’s use of these new social sites make Caffeine faster, more relevant, more current and most importantly of all, can it bring some democracy back into their index?

Of course, nothing in Google’s new index will be that cut and dry, that black and white. Other ranking factors such as age of site, past history and reputation, traffic numbers, authority branding… will all play a role in whether your site gets listed on that all important first page. However, on page factors may play a greater role – title, meta tags, description, keyword density, alt tags, page views, bounce rate, time spent on page, and the number of social bookmarks may play an increased role in achieving high rankings. Website speed or how fast your site loads may also be a new ranking factor.

Underlying this whole issue is the fact which many experienced webmasters/marketers already know, Google’s SERPs are not a one-trick pony anymore. For very lucrative (monetized) keyword phrases, Google’s results are broken up into Five categories… Info listings, Video listings, News Listings, Shopping Listings and Corporate Listings. Forget Caffeine, this is probably the fairest move Google has made in the last few years to make its SERPs more democratic.

Another even more puzzling issue for me concerning Google Caffeine is how much emphasis or ranking power will it place on “Keyworded Domains”, domain names which have your keyword or keyword phrase in them. Will these domains be ranked higher? Webmasters and marketers for years have been telling us we should always pick domain names which have our major keywords in them. Just common sense really, someone searching for “brown widgets” will more likely than not find that item at a domain called brownwidgets(dot)com or brownwidget(dot)com. The major SEO reasoning, all your backlinks will inherently have your searched keyword in the URL, thus bringing it up in the rankings.

Against this whole backdrop, everyone has to realize the web itself is evolving, new sites like Twitter, FaceBook… have changed the whole cyber landscape. Likewise, the web user is also changing and becoming more web savvy in how they use the web. Will search engines, not only Google, take a back-seat role in how we find stuff on the web? As major sites are branded into the web user’s psyche, will these users go directly to these sites, by-passing the search engines altogether?

As the web evolves, keyworded domains will become more valuable and this value will be reflected in the quality of the site. If you’re making thousands or even millions from your keyworded domain, you can afford to invest in quality content and design. Cream rises to the top. Gradually, as these domains become more valuable, they will probably be snapped up by marketers and companies who know just how to exploit them. Thousands upon thousands of keyworded domains will probably be bought up by multi-billion dollar corporations who finally realize what the web has to offer. This new evolved web will probably be much more narrower in scope and very topic specific.

In the “Next Generation” Web the Re-Direct Shall Be King!

Will the role of the search engines, whether it be Google or Bing/Yahoo, become less and less important, as savvy web searchers go directly to a site by typing in the keyworded domain to find what they’re looking for on the web? Cutting out the middleman may just become a world wide passion as big multinational and fully funded corporations snap up all these valuable and lucrative keyworded domains. Will we see these domains grow in importance and the search engines take more of a back-up role? Human nature dictates we always take the fastest route to our destination and the web will be no exception to this rule.

Have all the smart people at Google figured this out already, and designed the new Google Caffeine to reflect the growing importance of the keyworded domain? Of course, we can only speculate when it comes to just what Google is planning and doing with its next generation search engine, but will onsite factors and your domain name play a greater role in their organic SERPs?

Regardless of what the new sheriff actually does, when the dust finally settles on all these latest developments, the keyworded domain will probably be standing tall, watching the sun rise on a brand newday.

Source: SiteProNews

Does Google PageRank Count Anymore

Posted By on October 28, 2009

The rather startling news from Google Webmaster Trends Analyst Susan Moskwa that Google has ditched PageRank from Webmaster Tools.

We’ve been telling people for a long time that they shouldn’t focus on PageRank so much; many site owners seem to think it’s the most important metric for them to track, which is simply not true,” states Moskwa. “We removed it because we felt it was silly to tell people not to think about it, but then to show them the data, implying that they should look at it.” (Source: WebProNews)

Now, for SEO reasons or for ranking in Google’s index, PageRank has long been eunuchified by Google. However, even missing a few dangling bits, history has shown us, eunuchs still wheel tremendous power. PageRank is no different.

Regardless of what Google wants to happen, PageRank is still extremely important to anyone marketing on the web, especially if you’re selling SEO services or operating a web business. Try selling SEO services when that little green bar on your site is pointing to PR0 or worst yet, pointing to a solid gray bar.

Obtaining a high PR7 or PR8 simply means more business and revenues… regardless of how Google is or is not using PageRank. People know how to count and they learned long ago, a ten is a lot more than a big fat zero.

Placed against a PR1 site, a PR8 will win more respect in the eyes of potential clients and can produce enormous profits for the site owner and we won’t even mention the still widely practiced habit of selling links, which Google is desperately trying to stop. Total and full elimination of PageRank would be an honest start but it will still be an uphill, if not an unwinnable battle, for Google to fully eliminate link selling.

Even with my modest sites, I have turned down a small fortune by not selling text links on any of my sites. When I had a PR6 site instead of a PR4 – those link requests were nearly doubled. So one can easily understand Google’s position and the need to downplay PageRank, if they want to put even a small dent in all this link selling and buying, which is still running rampant on today’s web.

PageRank is Google’s creation, and unless they remove it fully from their system and the Google toolbar, then PageRank still Counts. Actually, in the whole scheme of marketing your website on the net, PageRank counts big time. And in more ways than one.

There are several reasons why you shouldn’t count PageRank out.

For years Google has been downplaying the important of PageRank and states it’s only one of about 200 ranking factors which determines how Google ranks its index for keywords. Obtaining top organic rankings for popular lucrative keywords in Google simply means money in the bank. Actually, even a movement of only one or two places on those first page SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages) can make a major difference to any online marketer’s bottom line.

Now while you can have a lower PR number and still rank above other higher PR pages for your chosen keywords, I have even had many times when my PR drops but my actual SERPs rankings in Google goes up, mainly due to building related relevant backlinks. So PageRank counts little towards your keyword rankings but it can’t be totally dismissed.

Mainly because, even if PR is just one ranking factor, in close competitive keyword battles (I am presently fighting tooth and nail for some very choice keywords) just one ranking factor such as high PR can make the difference of whether or not you get to the top spot. Big dogs are still jumping and for those of us who know how to count, getting a number one spot in Google makes all the difference in the world.

Not only because Google controls roughly 80% of all search engine traffic, but more importantly Google has established unmatched credibility and brand recognition in the eyes of potential customers visiting your site. Web users trust Google. Web users look to Google for guidance and direction. Web users believe what Google is telling them. In the online world, rightly or wrongly, perception is everything.

As an online marketer, I am completely amazed each day at the marketing power Google now commands with web surfers and with the general population. Google is king of online search and no other search engine even comes close to Google.

PageRank is Google’s ranking system, and in the eyes of those who notice these things, it still wheels tremendous influence and power. By default, PageRank is Google’s opinion of your site, and web users can count (at least to 10) and if Google believes people are still not counting when it comes to PageRank, then they are fully mistaken.

Search Engine Ranking Factors 2009

Posted By on August 26, 2009

Американское интернет-маркетинговое агентство SEOMoz опубликовало результаты исследования важности факторов ранжирования сайтов в поисковых системах. Были опрошены 100 известных SEO-специалистов, на основе их ответов сформированы ТОП-5 позитивных и негативных факторов ранжирования.

Итак, наиболее важны сегодня для поискового продвижения:

1. текст внешних ссылок, ключевые слова в анкорах;
2. cсылочная популярность, выражающаяся соотношением количества и качества внешних ссылок;
3. разнообразие источников внешних ссылок (количество линков с уникальных доменов);
4. ключевые слова в тэге Title;
5. “уровень доверия” поисковых систем к сайту (пресловутый “траст”), зависящий от количества ссылок с “трастовых” доменов

К технологиям, влияющим на ранжирование максимально негативно, отнесены следующие:

1. клоакинг (с целью обмана поисковика и манипуляции пользователем);
2. покупка ссылок на популярных ссылочных биржах;
3. внешние ссылки с сайтов/страниц с поисковым спамом;
4. клоакинг по параметру User Agent (отдача разных страниц пользователю и поисковому роботу);
5. частые технические сбои, недоступность сайта.

Минимальную ценность, по мнению экспертов, имеют такие действия, как расположение ключевых слов в тэгах и метатэгах, использование ключевых слов в URL страниц (тем временем, в русскоязычном SEO это считается, помимо прочего, одним из способов указать Яндексу географическую принадлежность сайта или страницы), плотность ключевых слов в тексте страницы, вычисляемая по формуле “количество ключевых слов, деленное на общее количество слов на странице”, ключевые слова в названиях картинок. Однако, менее высокая по сравнению с топовыми факторами ценность вовсе не делает эти технологии бесполезными.

Среди негативных факторов, не попавших в топовую пятерку, есть такие, как “злоупотребление тегом Nofollow в процессе “построения pagerank”", слишком длинные URL-ы и заголовки страниц, высокая повторяемость одного и того же анкора во внешних ссылках, а также различные технологии поискового спама, связанные с клоакингом, злоупотреблением ключевыми словами и разными способами скрывания текста. Полный список факторов ранжирования вместе с уровнем их важности можно посмотреть здесь

Помимо факторов ранжирования, эксперты создали список технологий привлечения ссылок, расставив их по степени эффективности. Топ-10 выглядит следующим образом:

1. линкбейтинг, создание вирусного контента;
2. блоггинг, работа с блогосферой;
3. классическое “создавайте ценный контент”;
4. PR (нечто большее, нежели рассылка пресс-релизов);
5. прямая покупка ссылок у конкретных владельцев сайтов;
6. виджеты и другие виды встраиваемого контента;
7. проведение конференций и других мероприятий;
8. пользовательский контент (UGC);
9. авторитетные каталоги (DMOZ, Yahoo);
10. нишевые социальные сообщества

Полный списокЭкспертам также задали несколько наиболее обсуждаемых в seo-сообществе вопросов. По мнению 87% опрошенных, после изменения алгоритма Google в феврале текущего года эта поисковая система стала отдавать предпочтение сайтам, связанным с известными и популярными брендами. 83% считают, что субдомены “наследуют” ряд запросонезависимых факторов ранжирования основного домена и других субдоменов. Только 10% считают, что данные Google Analytics как-то влияют на ранжирование сайтов. 70% уверены, что 301-й редирект передает основную массу факторов ранжирования от одного URL к другому только при определенных условиях, связанных с качеством контента и отсутствием поискового спама. 68% полагают, что ссылки с “Википедии”, несмотря на nofollow, влияют на ранжирование в Google положительно, но учитываются не как ссылки, а как индикаторы потенциального качества и авторитетности сайта.

Последний вопрос касался будушего SEO. У экспертов поинтересовались, каким образом в ближайшие 5 лет будет меняться отношение Google к ссылкам как к фактору ранжирования. 48% выразили мнение, что ссылки будут терять свою значимость, но все равно оставаться важным фактором, будут подключаться новые источники информации для ранжирования, например, данные об использовании сайта, связи социального графа. 37% считают, что ссылки не потеряют своей значимости, но будет заметно меняться то, какие ссылки и каким образом влияют на ранжирование. 15% считают, что в ближайшие 5 лет использование Google ссылок останется примерно таким же, каким было прошлные пять лет.

Небезынтересно оказалось заглянуть в архив SEOMoz.org и ознакомиться с аналогичными исследованиями факторов ранжирования за 2005 и 2007 годы (исследование проводится раз в два года). Вот как выгдядели десятки главных SEO-технологий за эти годы.

2005 год:

1. Тэг Title
2. тексты ссылок
3. ключевые слова в тексте документа
4. отсутствие проблем с доступом к сайту
5. внутренняя перелинковка
6. тематичность сайта
7. собственное ссылочное окружение источников внешних ссылок
8. ссылки с сайтов аналогичной или смежной тематики
9. общая ссылочная популярность сайта
10. заспамливание ключевиками

2007 год:

1. ключевые слова в тэге Title
2. общая ссылочная популярность сайта
3. тексты внутренних ссылок
4. внутренняя перелинковка
5. возраст сайта
6. тематическая релевантность сайту входящих ссылок
7. ссылочная популярность сайта в рамках тематического сообщества (совокупности сайтов той же тематики)
8. ключевые слова в текстах внутри
9. собственное ссылочное окружение источников внешних ссылок
10. тематическая близость ссылающихся страниц

Таким образом, эволюция поисковых технологий состоит прежде всего в учете новых источников информации о сайте, новых источников внешних ссылок. Эпоха Web 2.0 сделала популярными блоги и социальные сети – и поисковые системы все больше важности отдают ссылкам из этих источников. Виджеты появились не так давно, но уже являются полезным способом привлечения ссылок. Второе магистральное направление эволюции поискового ранжирования – урезание возможностей для оптимизаторов манипулировать им.